Market Comparison Report
A named comparison. Your own filing record compared with every other titleholder on the register, by name, using public register data only: assessment durations, register profile, pipeline exposure, enforcement history and spill envelope, each computed on the same published register the census is built from. Nothing is ranked, and the report is supplied under use terms.
Every titleholder is named. No one is given a position in a table.
This is a named comparison. Your record is set beside every other titleholder on the register, by name, using public register data only: nothing privately supplied, nothing from a confidential source. There is no ranking, no ordering, no top N and no league position. The report is commissioned by one titleholder and supplied under use terms, which govern how it may be used and shared.
Both halves are stated here rather than on delivery because they are the things most likely to be different from what a buyer assumed: other titleholders appear by name, and none of them, you included, is placed in an order.
The comparison we refuse to sell, and why
An all-time cross-operator duration league table is confounded by filing era: an operator's all-time median is substantially a measurement of when it filed, not how it files. We drafted one, tested it against an era control, and withdrew it. The report explains the failure mode instead of printing the table, and every duration comparison in it is made on a stated era basis with n on both sides.
What is measured, chapter by chapter.
Exact scope is set with you at commissioning, because the chapters that can carry a finding depend on how much of your record clears the reporting floor. The structure below is the template every engagement is built from.
| Chapter | What it measures, and on what basis |
|---|---|
| Duration position | Where your assessment durations sit against the industry on the post-2023 basis, with n and a confidence interval on every figure, and the wall-clock definition restated on the page. Presented as a dot strip: every industry plan a dot, your median marked with its n. No comparative claim is made on a cell below the reporting floor. |
| Your own trajectory | Your durations by decision year against the pooled market slope. A partial year is marked partial. No trend is fitted through a year with too few decisions, and no line is drawn through a single observation. |
| Forward exposure | How much of your open pipeline is currently exposed, estimated by survival analysis over the historical cohort with open plans censored rather than dropped. Conditional: this chapter fires only where you have enough open plans to support it, and where it does not it is dropped with the reason printed, not quietly omitted. No acceptance probability and no named decision date, ever. |
| Register profile and entity roll-up | Your filings by region and activity on the register's own fields, with the entity-to-group resolution shown, so you can see exactly which registered entities were rolled into your record and check them. |
| Current pipeline exposure | Your plans by current register status and days elapsed at the snapshot date. Current status only: the register does not publish a reliable status history, so no time-in-state or transition count is computed. |
| Public enforcement history | Your enforcement record across the full published notice corpus, as an event strip over time. Entity attribution is hand-checked, because notices frequently attach to drilling contractors rather than to the titleholder. No cleaner-or-dirtier judgment is made. |
| What the regulator rejects | The published decision-notice analysis: which acceptance criteria actually fail, by criterion. This chapter is identical in every buyer's copy because it is a fact about the regulator, not about you. Its window is stated on the page and it is never implied to describe a later period. |
| Worst-credible spill envelope | Your modelled spill envelope across the published record, plotted on a log scale because a linear one makes the comparison unreadable. Reported as extracted, with n. No quality judgment is attached. |
| Title portfolio | Your NOPTA title holdings, with the join checked per buyer. Held and operated interests are distinguished, and no market-share ranking phrase is used. |
| What this means | The closing chapter, written to what the measurements actually showed rather than to a template conclusion. |
| Section | What it carries |
|---|---|
| How to read this | Baseline definitions, the confidence-interval convention, the provenance legend, the wall-clock disclaimer, the n-suppression rule, NOPSEMA attribution and third-party copyright notice, and whether each chapter is computed on a census or a subset. |
| Executive summary | Six sentences at most, every one of them traceable to a specific exhibit in the body. |
| Data appendix | The table behind every chart. Every figure in the report can be read as arithmetic on its own face. |
| Methodology and limits | What was measured, how, and what the public record cannot support. Stated in place as well as collected here. |
| Dispute and correction path | Written, in the document. If you believe a figure is wrong, there is a named route to contest it and a stated undertaking on how a correction is published. |
| Version log | Report identifier, snapshot date and version history, so two copies of the report can be told apart. |
The constraints are the product.
- A reporting floor, applied visibly. No comparative claim is made on a cell below the floor. Thin cells are printed with their n and marked, not dropped and not quietly included.
- n and a confidence interval on every comparison. A point estimate with no interval invites a precision the data does not have.
- The baseline is named on the page that uses it. Where your record supports a matched baseline of your home region and activity, that is used; where it does not, the full industry baseline is used and the page says which is in force.
- No causal claim. Where a gap is measured, its mechanism is not asserted. The finding is the measurement.
- No quoted Environment Plan text from any other titleholder. Plan documents remain their titleholders' copyright.
- Human-checked before delivery. A person reads the rendered report against the underlying queries before it leaves.
- Every figure re-derives from a pinned snapshot. Any number in it can be checked against the exact register state it was computed from.
What this report will not do.
It will not go beyond the public record
Every titleholder named in it is compared on public register data only. Nothing privately supplied by anyone enters a figure.
It will not rank you
No position, no percentile-of-operators, no top N. Ordering operators against each other is the claim the era confound makes indefensible.
It will not predict an outcome
No acceptance probability, no decision date for any plan, no smooth extrapolated line past the data. Forward exposure is conditional and says so in the same sentence.
It will not grade your plans on how they read
Extraction depth is uneven across the public corpus, so a raw measure of how thoroughly a plan cites or covers a topic measures our extractor as much as your drafting. We do not sell that comparison.
Scoped with you, then invoiced per engagement.
Start with an enquiry naming your titleholder entity or entities. We resolve them against the register, tell you which chapters your record can actually support and which will be dropped for want of n, and quote from there. From A$25,000 ex GST per titleholder, the final price fixed in the agreed scope, invoiced per engagement, independent of any subscription.
ProveINTEL is Klarite's tool for analysing the NOPSEMA public register of Environment Plans. Every figure is derived from the NOPSEMA public register at info.nopsema.gov.au and other published sources named in the report. ProveINTEL is not affiliated with, or endorsed by, NOPSEMA.
Tell us who you are, and we will tell you what your record supports.
The first answer is which chapters clear the reporting floor on your own filings. That is a real answer whether or not you go ahead, and it is how every engagement starts.
Or write to services@klarite.com.au.